RESOLUTION N º 744/09 SCJBA
/ / / SILVER, April 1, 2009.
SEEN: public demonstrations from different areas link the factors of insecurity to the performance of the Judiciary of the Province, and
WHEREAS: I. - That falls to the Supreme Court, representing the judiciary (art. 160 of the Provincial Constitution, art. 32 paragraph a] of the 5827 Act; Agreement 41 of the 16-IX-1876), must adopt and make public its position on the circumstances mentioned in the prologue. II .- That in the exercise of his momentous task of administering justice, judges adjust their performance to a legal system composed of international treaties, constitutional provisions, laws and regulations.
III .- That is not justice which has sanctioned the block policy which must necessarily hold their work in a state of law, nor has generated the social conditions of marginalization, even if they are not the sole factor of this problem. The same corresponds to the activity are prevented by executive and educator, while promoting the rulers.
IV .- That we are aware that our work is not without its faults. And it is legitimate to disagree with the meaning of some statements, which are public acts. But when criticism comes from other senior levels of government, it seems reasonable that, while it is formulated, it ignore that against every decision there are levels of review and the performance of judges and members of the Attorney General is subject intervention of the Trial Jury of Judges or, where appropriate, to the disciplinary authority within the judiciary. Thus, the noise can not be used to circumvent these mechanisms media without affecting the independence of the judiciary.
V. - That, therefore, deal with disputes and reviews that
security-related issues arise now we must move away from the superficiality as a means of expression, taking deep in all levels of government activity is the legitimate concern that they cause in the population and self-criticism needed to overcome the flaws that trigger innate in all human, sometimes exhibit the three branches that partners in the political life of the Republic, with maturity and without trying to shirk civic responsibility that demands.
VI .- That a serious and determined effort to promote the general welfare, thoroughly analyze the important issues involved in social causes of crime, trying to overcome them, to allocate resources effectively public and protect human rights, will get the desired improvement of public safety.
THEREFORE, the Supreme Court, along with Ms. Attorney General, in exercise of its powers,
RESOLVED:
so declare.
Register and contact.
FDO: JUAN CARLOS Hitters, LUIS ESTEBAN Genoud, HILDA Kogan, JULIO EDUARDO
PETTIGIANI, NESTOR EDUARDO Lazzari, DANIEL FERNANDO SORIA, MARIA DEL CARMEN
FALB (Attorney General), to me, JORGE OMAR PAOLINI (Secretary for Constitutional Affairs
)
0 comments:
Post a Comment