D omingo, April 11, 2010
a brutal brand of Catholicism
For
When Sunead O'connor was small, Catholic Ireland was a theocracy. If a bishop came down the street, people would move to let the step. If attending a sporting event, the team was coming to kneel and kiss his ring. If someone made a mistake, instead of saying "Nobody's perfect", we said "It could happen to a bishop."
This last sentence was more successful than we imagined. A few days ago, Pope Benedict XVI wrote a personal letter apologizing for calling him-somehow-to Ireland for decades of sexual abuse of minors by some priests who were supposed to be trusting these children. To many, the Pope's letter is an insult not only to our intelligence but our faith and our country. To understand why, we must bear in mind that the Irish have suffered a brutal brand of Catholicism based on the humiliation of children.
I myself lived. As a child, my mother, an abusive mother, the opposite of what should be a good mother encouraged me to steal in stores. Once I was caught and spent 18 months at the Training Centre An Grianán, an institution for children with behavior problems in Dublin, on the recommendation of a social worker. An Grianán Center was one of the now infamous "Magdalen laundries of" sponsored by the Church, which housed pregnant teenagers and young little tame. Worked in the basement laundry of the curates in sinks with cold water and soap cakes. Studying math and typing. We had little contact with our families. We earned no salary. In my case, at least one of the nuns was good to me and gave me my first guitar. An
Grianán was the product of the Irish government's relationship with the Vatican, the Church enjoyed a "special position" referred to in our Constitution until 1972. As recently as 2007, 98 percent of Irish schools was in the hands of Catholic Church. But schools for troubled youth have been rife with savage punishment, psychological abuse and sexual abuse. In October 2005 a report commissioned by the government identified more than 100 allegations of sexual abuse by priests between 1962 and 2002 in Ferns, a town about 100 miles south of Dublin. The police did not investigate the accused priests, said he was suffering from a problem "moral." In 2009, a similar report involving the Archbishops of Dublin in the concealment of sexual abuse scandals that occurred between 1975 and 2004.
Why tolerate such criminal behavior? According to the 2009 report, the "important role played by the Church in Irish life is the reason why is agreed that no end to the abuses committed by a minority of its members."
Despite the long relationship between the Church and the Irish government, the letter asks Pope Benedict XVI, in theory, forgiveness does not assume any liability for infringements of Irish priests. Says that "the Church in Ireland must acknowledge before the Lord and to other serious sins committed against a defenseless children." What about the Vatican's complicity in these sins?
In his text, Benedict gives the impression that it has recently learned of the abuses and comes as a victim: "I have no choice but to share the heartache and the sense of betrayal you have experienced so many of you to know about them sinful and criminal acts, and how they dealt with the ecclesiastical authorities in Ireland. " However, the infamous letter sent by Benedict in 2001 to bishops around the world were ordered to keep secret allegations of sexual abuse under pain of excommunication, ie updated a pernicious policy of the Church, expressed in a document 1962, which stated that both the accused priests sexual crimes and their victims should "observe the strictest secrecy" and "face eternal silence."
Benedict, then Joseph Ratzinger, was a cardinal when he wrote that letter. Today, when it occupies the chair of St. Peter, are we to believe that his opinion has changed? And we will settle at recent revelations that in 1996 he refused to remove a priest accused of abusing up to 200 deaf children in the U.S. state of Wisconsin?
Benedict's letter stated that his concern is "mostly help heal the victims." However, denied that could heal them: a confession Vatican clear that concealed the abuse and is now trying to conceal the hiding. Surprisingly, the Pope invites Catholics to "offer your fast, your prayers, your reading of the Scriptures and your works of mercy for the grace of healing and renewal of the Church of Ireland." And it suggests, even more amazing, that victims can heal Irish getting closer to the Church, the Church which required vows of silence to child victims of abuse, as occurred in 1975 in the case of Father Brendan Smyth, a priest Irishman who later ended up in prison for repeated sexual offenses. Many Irish, when we stopped laughing, we said that the idea that we need to approach the church Jesus is a blasphemy.
For Irish Catholics, as Benedict suggests, that sexual abuse in Ireland is an Irish problem "is arrogant and blasphemous. The Vatican is acting as if he did not believe in a God who sees everything. Those who claim to be the guardians of the Holy Spirit are dedicated to crush all that the Holy Spirit is. Benedict is guilty of giving a false image of God we worship. We all know in the bottom of our hearts that the Holy Spirit is the truth. So we know that Christ is not with those who call upon him so frequency.
Irish Catholics have a dysfunctional relationship with an organization that commits abuses. The pope must take responsibility for the actions of their subordinates. If Catholic priests who abuse children, it is Rome, and not Dublin, it should respond with a full confession and undergoing a criminal investigation. Until it does, all good Catholics, including old ladies who go to church every Sunday, not just protest singers like me, who can ignore the Vatican without problem, should stop visiting the temple. It is time that Ireland split up to our God of our religion and faith of their supposed leaders.
almost 18 years ago broke a photo of Pope John Paul II in an episode of Saturday Night Live. Many did not understand the objection, the following week, the program's guest host, actor Joe Pesci, said that had he been present, I "would have been slapped." I knew that my actions would cause problems, but wanted to provoke a necessary debate, this is one of the ingredients of being an artist. My only regret was that people thought he did not believe in God. Not true at all. I am Catholic by birth and culture, and be the first to show up at the door of the Church when the Vatican offered a sincere reconciliation.
As Ireland supports the offensive letter to Rome asking for forgiveness and an Irish bishop resigns, ask Americans to understand why an Irish Catholic woman who survived abuse as a child might want to break the photo of the Pope. And to think if the Irish Catholics, not daring to say "deserve better", we should be treated as though we deserved something worse.
This is the letter that Sinead O'Connor was released in the United States last week after Benedict XVI's apology for child abuse committed by Catholic priests in Ireland.
Enrique Stola
Buenos Aires, Argentina